The survey, conducted between March 1 and 5, involved 1,147 respondents who have an interest in politics.
Their answers were as follows:
Sources for information on the protest:
Television: 70.04%
Facebook: 65.33%
Live broadcasts: 37.29%
Word of mouth: 36.33%
Websites: 31%
Thoughts on the anti-government movement:
Different from the past: 55.33%
More young people fighting for democracy: 50.61%
Constitution guarantees right to hold protests: 49.04%
More frequent clashes between protesters and police: 48.43%
Situation worsened by presence of third parties: 47.9%
Government’s move to tackle protesters:
Focus on intercepting protests/arresting leaders: 51.41%
Using violent measures: 50.35%
Moves to control the situation: 48.94%
Ignoring protesters’ demands: 46.92%
Authorities only trying to maintain peace: 41.11%
How best to resolve the situation:
Both sides should come to an understanding: 50.07%
Government must pay attention to protesters’ demands: 13.67%
PM must resign, charter amended, Parliament dissolved: 10.79%
Rallies must be peaceful and held under the law: 9.64%
Both sides must seek solutions together: 5.04%
Views on pro-democracy protests:
Disagree: 27.3%
Almost agree: 25.2%
Almost disagree: 23.98%
Agree: 23.19%
Government’s moves to tackle protests:
Disagree: 39.49%
Almost agree: 28.6%
Almost disagree: 23.63%
Agree: 8.28%
Assoc Prof Anchalee Ratana, a lecturer at Suan Dusit University’s School of Law and Politics, said the government's moves to disperse pro-democracy rallies were unacceptable under universal principles because holding protests is part of one’s constitutional rights.
“The government should allow protesters to express themselves to find a solution together. Protesters should also improve their behaviour to protect themselves and maintain their rights under the Constitution,” she said.