Buddhist nationalists, following the fear and uncertainty caused by successive waves of anti-Muslim violence, have issued fiery pronouncements that the very fabric of the country’s main religion is under threat, casting a dark shadow over ongoing democratic reforms.
The marriage law is one of four bills suggested by a hardline faction within the Buddhist clergy and put to the fledgling parliament by the president.
To “protect” Buddhism – the religion of more than 80 per cent of the population – radical monks have urged boycotts of Muslim businesses, including of Qatari telecoms firm Ooredoo.
And they have warned that Buddhist women are at risk from Muslim men, a tactic “calibrated for emotional impact”, said Nicholas Farrelly, a research fellow at the Australian National University.
“These calls help to generate a mood of crisis that radicalises those who would otherwise be relatively apathetic about other religions in Myanmar,” he said.
While ethnic Bamar Buddhists dominates the country, it has sizeable religious minorities due in part to the legacy of British colonial rule.
Christians make up about 4 per cent of the population, and Muslims are thought to account for between 4 and 10 per cent.
The commercial hub of Yangon is dominated by the glittering Shwedagon, a revered golden pagoda, but the city also boasts dozens of churches and mosques.
‘Uncertain times’
Conflict flared between Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims in western Myanmar’s Rakhine state in 2012, leaving more than 200 people dead and 140,000 displaced.
Communal violence spread to other parts of the country last year, unearthing deep-seated animosities as the nation emerges from totalitarian junta rule.
If enacted, Farrelly said the laws could receive “wide support”, particularly in working-class and middle-class Buddhist areas “where angst about Muslim ‘incursions’ is high” at a time of huge transition in the country.
The proposed restrictions – on marriage, religious conversion, polygamy and birth rate – were put forward by a 200-strong group of monks called “Mabatha”, or the Committee for the Protection of Nationality and Religion.
A draft of the conversion bill – which would require anyone wanting to change religion to seek a slew of bureaucratic permissions – has already been produced.
The bill “has no place in the 21st century”, according to the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, which warned that together the proposals risk stoking violence and discrimination.
‘Protecting’ Buddhist women?
Leading Mabatha monk Sopaka defended the measures, saying they would help combat violence.
“I really believe that this law can protect Myanmar Buddhist women,” he said.
Nearly 100 women’s groups signed a statement last month criticising the proposals, saying they failed to acknowledge Buddhist women’s ability to “think rationally and make decisions” about their own lives.
Many have since found themselves subjected to threats of violence through anonymous calls and messages.
US Ambassador Derek Mitchell has said these are “unconscionable and dangerous for the health of this nascent democracy”.
May Sabe Phyu, of the Gender Equality Network, said the marriage plans would do little to stop abuses affecting women across communities in Myanmar, from domestic violence, to sexual and conflict-related assaults.
“We believe that nationality and religion are not things that have to be protected by legal force,” she said.
She echoed the widely held belief that the rise of Buddhist nationalism is being used as a political tool to wrong-foot Aung San Suu Kyi’s opposition ahead of key 2015 elections.
The Nobel laureate, one of the few women in Myanmar’s parliament, has spoken out against the inter-faith marriage proposals.